Ben Goldacre, Surrogate Outcomes and Education

I was at Ben Goldacre’s fascinating talk in the RCSI yesterday and much of what he had to say about bad drug trials resonated with me as an educator. His point that some branches of medicine were riddled with “endless pilot studies” sounded to me like it could have been said about teaching and learning research

One of his more interesting points concerned the issue of “surrogate outcomes”. An example of the might be if you were to test a new heart drug and use, say, blood pressure as a measure of the drug’s efficacy. You might find that the drug does lower blood pressure but when you dig down into the data you might find that the drug has absolutely no effect on the incidence of heart attacks. In some cases, the surrogate outcome might even be in direct opposition to the desired outcome.

It seems to me that education research has a big problem with surrogate outcomes. Whether it’s students answering questionnaires or teachers/lecturers making a judgement about student ‘engagement’, the fundamental question as to whether students have learned better or not is rarely answered.


About Greg Foley

A lecturer in Biotechnology in Dublin City University for more than 25 years. Trained as a Chemical Engineer in UCD (BE and PhD) and Cornell (MS). Does research on analysis and design of membrane filtration systems.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Ben Goldacre, Surrogate Outcomes and Education

  1. Pingback: Ninth Level Ireland » Blog Archive » Ben Goldacre, Surrogate Outcomes and Education

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s