Experience of an Education conference

Over the last couple of days I’ve been attending the New Perspectives in Science Education conference  in Florence. I gave a talk (an honest one!) on my experience of teaching on an interdisciplinary programme.

This is my first ever education conference and it has been an interesting experience. A few things have struck me:

  1. Nobody really seems to be addressing the quite fundamental issue of how we actually measure student learning. Most of the time we use proxies like ‘engagement’.
  2. Inquiry-based approaches are very popular and it is interesting that there are very few, if any, dissenting voices. IBL and PBL are presumed to be inherently good. Nobody mentions concepts like cognitive load, for example. Nor do people address the fact that when IBL and PBL approaches are used, there is a loss (in the acquisition of knowledge) as well as a supposed gain in ‘skills’.
  3. Many education researchers don’t seem to define what precise problem they are trying to fix when they innovate. There seems to be an underlying presumption that traditional teaching, in which the teacher charts a course through a subject for the student, and actually explains stuff to the student, is not fit for purpose.
  4. It seems to me that the education field as a whole suffers from confirmation bias. Innovation is always seen as a Good Thing and small-scale studies invariably claim to support the innovation in question.
  5. Some researchers are still fixated on learning styles.
  6. Many STEM educators believe that if only we taught STEM subjects in a more engaging and relevant way, more students would learn to appreciate and even love these subjects. (I don’t agree. I believe that science is fundamentally abstract and only appeals to a minority.)
  7. An awful lot of conference presentations are pretty dull. This is ironic given that this conference was an education one.
  8. The teaching of maths seems to be a challenge everywhere and the only solution seems to be to link maths with the ‘real world’, thus denying the very essence of mathematics. (Maths is an abstract language; you shouldn’t need to do experiments, for example, to justify the laws of probability.)
  9. It is interesting that many studies focus on teaching methodologies but make very little mention of the teacher. I would have thought that the teacher is the x-factor in all of education.
  10. Thankfully, I didn’t hear the phrase 21st Century Skills even once. Mind you, one presenter came dangerously close to mentioning “jobs that don’t exist”.

All in all, an interesting experience but I got the sense that group-think is a bit of an issue in education research.


About Greg Foley

A lecturer in Biotechnology in Dublin City University for more than 25 years. Trained as a Chemical Engineer in UCD (BE and PhD) and Cornell (MS). Does research on analysis and design of membrane filtration systems.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Experience of an Education conference

  1. Pingback: Ninth Level Ireland » Blog Archive » Experience of an Education conference

  2. cormac says:

    Sounds like an interesting conference (why do so few academics blog about conference experiences?)
    I don’t think it’s entirely true that “science is fundamentally abstract and only appeals to a minority” . I think there are both pragmatic and abstract aspects to science. (As it happens, much of my own recent research is about showing that many of Einstein’s papers contain an extremely pragmatic aspect, a side of his work that has been hugely overlooked).
    Similarly, I don’t entirely agree that “Maths is an abstract language”. It certainly can be, but it can also be very pragmatic…

  3. cormac says:

    I posted a comment but it disappeared into the ether. Well done anyway, not nearly enough blogposts on conferences

  4. chrisgrabski19 says:

    Agree with a few points, but one in particular, number 9. We must not forget how important teacher’s personality, relationship & belief in children are in good teaching and learning.

  5. Exactly right. Group-think in the education world is extremely powerful. Had a similar experience at an informal gathering that is called “Ed Camp”. See http://bit.ly/1Sq6WTp

  6. Pingback: More drift in Ireland’s Education System | educationandstuff

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s